He May Have Published a
Book That Look favorably on Palestinian Rights in ``Palestine: Peace Not
Apartheid,’’ but Research on Former President Carter shows another Side.
By Brother Tracy Gibson
If Former President
Jimmy Carter is a ``Peace Lover and Man of Peace’’ I ask why won’t He take His
name off the nuclear submarine named after Him? This sub, like all war machines
of the United States, is a moving casket full of enough weapons to destroy this
precious earth we live on. That doesn’t sound like a ``man of Peace’’ to me. Have
you ever noticed the former president has nothing much to say about the plague
of current information restraining legislation and oppressive legislation that
was passed over the last 13 years after 9/11? These Laws called the Patriot Act
I; The Patriot Act II and other such oppressive legislation have been used to
water down civil liberties, for searches that otherwise would have been illegal
& to justify anti-terrorist acts like torture, taking prisoners overseas
and even murder? Here is part of the equation that provides an answer to the
question about Jimmy Carter’s lack of support for more Progressive activities
by He and the Carter Center:
From Howard Zinn’s book:
``A People’s History of the United
States,’’ from pages 566-567: ``His
{Carter’s} most crucial appointments, however, were in keeping with the
Trilateral Commission report of Harvard political scientist Samuel Huntington,
which said that, whatever groups voted to for a president, once elected ``what
counts then is his ability to mobilize support from the leaders of key
institutions.’’ Brzezinski, a traditional cold-war intellectual, became
Carter’s National Security Advisor. His Secretary of Defense, Harold Brown,
had, during the Vietnam war, according to the Pentagon Papers,
``envisaged the elimination of virtually all the constraints under which
the bombing them operated.’’ His Secretary of Energy, James Schlesinger, as
Secretary of Defense under Nixon, was described by a member of the Washington
press corps as showing ``an almost missionary drive in seeking to reverse a downward
trend in the defense budget.’’ Schlesinger was also a strong proponent of
nuclear energy. ‘’
``His other cabinet
appointees had strong corporate connections. A financial writer wrote, not long
after Carter’s election: ``So far Mr. Carter’s actions, commentary, and
particularly his Cabinet appointments, have been highly reassuring to the
business community.’’ Veteran Washington correspondent Tom Wicker wrote: ``The
available evidence is that Mr. Carter so far is opting for Wall Street
confidence.’’
``Carter did initiate
more sophisticated policies towards governments that oppressed their own
people. He used United Nations Ambassador
Andrew Young to build up good will for the United States among the Black
African nations, and urged that South Africa liberalize its policies towards
blacks. A peaceful settlement in South Africa was necessary for strategic
reasons; South Africa was used for radar tracking systems. Also, it had
important U.S. corporate investments and was a critical source of needed raw
materials (diamonds, especially). Therefore, what the United States needed was
a stable government in South Africa; the continued oppression of blacks might
create civil war.’’
``The same approach
was used in other countries—combining practical strategic needs with the
advancement of civil rights. But because the chief motivation was practicality,
not humanity, there was a tendency toward token changes—as in Chile’s release
of a few political prisoners. When Congressman Herman Badillo introduced in
Congress a proposal the required the U.S. representatives to the World Bank and
other international financial institutions to vote against loans to countries
that systematically violated essential rights, by the use of torture or
imprisonment without trial, Carter sent a personal letter to every Congressman
urging the defeat of this amendment. It won a voice vote in the House, but lost
in the Senate.’’
``Under Carter, the
United States continued to support, all over the world, regimes that engaged in
imprisonment of dissenters, torture, and mass murder: in the Philippines, in
Iran, in Nicaragua, and in Indonesia, where the inhabitants of East Timor were
being annihilated in a campaign bordering on genocide. ‘’
``The New Republic magazine, presumably on the
liberal side of the Establishment, commented approvingly on the Carter
policies: ``… American foreign policy in the next four years will essentially
extend the philosophies developed … in the Nixon-Ford years. This is not at all
a negative prospect … There should be continuity. It is part of history … ‘’
No comments:
Post a Comment